5/29/2023 0 Comments Disk aid versus drive doctor![]() In the long run, consistent rapid recovery may justify a more expensive disk storage option. These are crucial metrics that organizations use to calculate the monetary cost of data loss and application downtime.ĭisk-based options offer much quicker backups and restores when compared to tape, and disk can help organizations reach their RTO and RPO goals. Recovery point objective (RPO) and recovery time objective (RTO) quantify the amount of data that may be lost and how quickly data can be restored during an outage. Raw costs alone, however, aren't the only important factor in determining a backup method. ![]() This is an especially important when considering the large amounts of data a modern organization needs to back up. When compared head-to-head on a per-terabyte basis, however, tape consistently presents the cheapest storage option. Both tape and disk backup technologies present a cost-effective option when compared to higher performance solid-state technology. It's impossible to consider the effectiveness of a storage media as a backup tool without considering costs. To a lesser degree, some organizations may take sustainability into account when they choose to invest in their tools, as well as look at how the tool has evolved and may continue to improve over time. Disks have steadily transitioned from predominantly handling primary workloads to operating as backup targets.Ĭost, performance and security are a few of the major factors backup admins must consider when evaluating tape vs. As the cost of HDDs has decreased, disk has become a worthy backup competitor. All Rights Reserved.Tape has long cemented itself as a natural backup tool by providing low-cost storage where performance hasn't been a priority. Click here for more information.įor further troubleshooting please contact Verbatim Technical Support.Īll trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |